1 DOS - P R E L I S 1.12 0 BY 0 KARL G JORESKOG AND DAG SORBOM This program is published exclusively by SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE, Inc. 1369 Neitzel Road Mooresville, Indiana 46158, U.S.A. (317)-831-6336 Copyright by Scientific Software, Inc. (a Michigan corporation), 1981-89. Partial copyright by Microsoft Corporation, 1984-1989. All rights reserved. 0THE FOLLOWING PRELIS CONTROL LINES HAVE BEEN READ : PRELIS EXAMPLE: LSAT-6 DATA (BOCK & LIEBERMAN, 1970); da ni = 5 nobs = 1000 missing = -9 treatment = pairwise raw-data-from file = lsat6.txt labels item1 item2 item3 item4 item5 ordinal item1 - item5 output matrix = pmatrix sm = matrix2.txt 1 0TOTAL SAMPLE SIZE = 1000 0CONVERSION OF ORIGINAL VALUES TO CATEGORIES 0 CATEGORY 0VARIABLE 1 2 + ________________ ITEM1 1.00 2.00 ITEM2 1.00 2.00 ITEM3 1.00 2.00 ITEM4 1.00 2.00 ITEM5 1.00 2.00 0UNIVARIATE FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS FOR ORDINAL VARIABLES 0 CATEGORY 0VARIABLE 1 2 + ________ ITEM1 76 924 ITEM2 291 709 ITEM3 447 553 ITEM4 237 763 ITEM5 130 870 0 CONTINGENCY TABLES FOR ORDINAL VARIABLES 0 ITEM2 ITEM3 ITEM4 ITEM5 + ______ ______ ______ ______ ITEM1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 +________ ______ ______ ______ ______ 1 31 45 47 29 23 53 12 64 2 260 664 400 524 214 710 118 806 0 ITEM3 ITEM4 ITEM5 + ______ ______ ______ ITEM2 1 2 1 2 1 2 +________ ______ ______ ______ 1 156 135 81 210 51 240 2 291 418 156 553 79 630 0 ITEM4 ITEM5 + ______ ______ ITEM3 1 2 1 2 +________ ______ ______ 1 129 318 67 380 2 108 445 63 490 0 ITEM5 + ______ ITEM4 1 2 +________ ______ 1 45 192 2 85 678 1 CORRELATIONS AND TEST STATISTICS (PE=PEARSON PRODUCT MOMENT, PC=POLYCHORIC, PS=POLYSERIAL) 0 TEST OF MODEL TEST OF ZERO CORR. CORRELATION CHI-SQU. D.F. P-VALUE CHI-SQU. P-VALUE + ___________ ________ ____ _______ ________ _______ ITEM2 VS. ITEM1 .170 (PC) .000 0 1.000 29.493 .000 ITEM3 VS. ITEM1 .228 (PC) .000 0 1.000 53.466 .000 ITEM3 VS. ITEM2 .189 (PC) .000 0 1.000 36.522 .000 ITEM4 VS. ITEM1 .107 (PC) .000 0 1.000 11.543 .000 ITEM4 VS. ITEM2 .111 (PC) .000 0 1.000 12.419 .000 ITEM4 VS. ITEM3 .187 (PC) .000 0 1.000 35.574 .000 ITEM5 VS. ITEM1 .067 (PC) .000 0 1.000 4.422 .035 ITEM5 VS. ITEM2 .172 (PC) .000 0 1.000 30.241 .000 ITEM5 VS. ITEM3 .105 (PC) .000 0 1.000 11.178 .000 ITEM5 VS. ITEM4 .201 (PC) .000 0 1.000 41.367 .000 1PRELIS EXAMPLE: LSAT-6 DATA (BOCK & LIEBERMAN, 1970); 0 ESTIMATED CORRELATION MATRIX 0 ITEM1 ITEM2 ITEM3 ITEM4 ITEM5 + ________ ________ ________ ________ ________ ITEM1 1.000 ITEM2 .170 1.000 ITEM3 .228 .189 1.000 ITEM4 .107 .111 .187 1.000 ITEM5 .067 .172 .105 .201 1.000 0 THE PROBLEM USED 10160 BYTES (= 3.9% OF AVAILABLE WORKSPACE)